Date: 27th August 2007 at 8:12pm
Written by:

Yes, I know, this one’s been on the backburner for a little too long. With Saturday’s match now more than forty eight hours on the horizon, I presume the finer points of the game have been dissected and diagnosed to death. But, I like to flatter myself that people like to read my opinions so I’ll provide them anyway and, in the words of Julian Casblancas, take it or leave it. The tardiness of this report can be attributed squarely to the fact that one cannot shirk from a barbecue and a wee drinky on a glorious summer’s Sunday. And with the Bank Holiday weather upholding it’s end of the bargain into today, I just could not resist the overtures of some fishing in Tonbridge.

Anyways, the Citeh game pretty much followed the pattern of Arsenal’s season in that we were not exceptional, but we did enough to get the result. This is a quality we have lacked consistently in the last two seasons, so I take the fact that we are far from our best, yet picking up the points, as huge encouragement. It’s early days yet, but the Gunners’ seem to have matured. Arriving at the stadium in our uncannily punctual fashion (i.;e right on kick off) I was very surprised to see Gilberto Silva in the starting line up. I was even more surprised to see that Kolo Toure had been awarded the armband ahead of the talismanic Brazilian. However, this would appear to have been explained away by Philippe Senderos’s last minute pull out. Gilberto performed as you would expect from a man of his laudable attitude. Being thrown back into the fire in an unfamiliar position, selected minutes before kick off, he took care of business. His calm autority at the back was crucial in the absence of the injured William Gallas and the ‘injured’ Jens Lehmann.

Arsenal were a little slow to come out of the blocks, with Eriksson’s side ruthlessly organised. The crowd responded with their usual impatient bluster, as time and again Micah Richards and Richard Dunne would thwart our advances. Michael Johnson was running amok in midfield and the blues looked a very impressive outfit, disciplined and willing to work for each other. But our entrapy in the first half is quite explainable, against sides ready to run their wotsits off like City, it makes much more sense to hit them in the last half an hour of the game. Arsenal are a very fit side and statistics show we score the majority of our goals late in games. City might have taken the lead in the first half, apromising breakaway culminating in a weak attempt from Elano with Mpenza placed promisingly to his right. Bacary Sagna was forced off injured after an unfortunate collision with Matty Flamini, typical as he has started the season with great applomb, thankfully the diagnosis was not too serious. Flamini moved to right back and Denilson came on in central midfield and gave an assured display which belied his years, offering some intelligent and combative play. He looks to be the complete player to me, he is gifted enough to play the pass of finesse, but intelligent enough to be economical. An arty Brazilian who does not mind a meaty challenge, he was able to keep City’s livewire Michael Johnson more quiet. The Gunners’ created little of note in the first half, relying a little too readily on the long ball to Adebayor, with the physical presence of Richards and Dunne dealing with Arsenal’s flighted passes with ease. The Gunners’ most promising moments came when the likes of Hleb and Denilson were involved in the play, cutting through City with short, swift passing.

This was a message obviously radiated by Wenger at half time. Adebayor had played the role of withdrawn striker in the first half, meaning that when he did win the aerial challenge, the ball would often drop into no man’s land, marshalled ably by the City back line. In the second half, van Persie was the one dropping deep, encouraging the Gunners’ to pass the ball into his feet, and leave Adebayor to make his presence felt in the penalty box. Hleb, Rosicky and Denilson continued to dictate the rhythm and orchestrate attacks. With Denilson next to him in midfield Cesc was not under so much pressure to be the architect and was encouraged to go forwards. But despite Arsenal’s territorial dominance, City could have twice taken the lead on the counter attack. Firstly as Emile Mpenza raced clear only to be thwarted by the assured Almunia. Latterly, when the lively Martin Petrov drilled a low shot agonisingly wide. But the home side continued to plug away and Alex Hleb, who had been a constant nuisance to Garrido all afternoon, cut inside from the right (annoying when he does that isn’t it?), jinking past one defender before Micah Richards crudely took him down from behind.

van Persie stepped up, Arsenal’s Dutch striker versus Schmeichel from the penalty spot, we had been here before. Kasper proved to be a most unfriendly ghost from the Gunners’ past as he beat away van Persie’s low effort. I thought that we might have blown it at that point. With City looking very resolute, you had the feeling that when Arsenal’s chance came we were going to have to take it. van Persie made an instant attempt at redemption, running with vigour at the City backline before unleashing a low shot which Schmeichel held comfortably. Fabregas collected a Hleb lay off, but his shot was straight at Rudolf junior. But a most welcome breakthrough was to arrive. Alex Hleb again laying the foundations with a run from the right, before laying the ball off in the area (annoying when he does that isn’t it?) and Fabregas unleashed a vicious drive into the roof of the net from an acute angle. Last season it would have cannoned off the crossbar. Fabregas appears to encapsulate Arsenal’s new found maturity. Again, he had an insipid game, but yet again, his contribution was match altering.

Arsenal held out, despite Schmeichel’s last ditch header, Manuel Almunia seemingly sensing the drama made a quite elaborate save. It was another grind for the points, but City come out of the match with immense credit, they looked a disciplined and organised outfit with intelligence in the final third. The likes of Petrov and Elano have the ability to hurt teams, and City would have been good value for a point. I am hopeful that City can maintain their good start to the season, my reasosn are two fold. Firstly, the treatment of England’s second most successful manager in their history is quite appalling and an example of the ‘blame Johnny Foreigner’ culture which permeates our media. The reasons for England’s perceived failure are far less simplistic. Secondly, because I’ve always had a soft spot for City, our fans have bonded with them over the years due to a mutual distaste for the red half of Manchester, their fans are always a great crack and every time I’ve visited their ground, the banter has always been top quality. (One year at Maine Road, having gone into the break four goals down to Arsenal, the City fans piped up seconds after the restart with ‘nil nil, in the second half.’ Followed very closely by ‘What’s it like to be outclassed?’) With the naysayers being only too quick to write Arsenal off, the boys have quietly gone about their business with some old fashioned elbow grease, let’s hope the lazy hacks keep writing us off.LD.

 

33 Replies to “Cesc and the City”

  • and yeah – agreed, i hope they all continue to say we are not of sufficient quality, i for one would take great delight in hearing Alan Hansen bitterly proclaim us as worthy champions at the end of the seaosn, after saying how we are sh**e and can’t take a kicking… »»Arsene Knows««

  • nothign at all,LD, especially in the Premiership, where you’ve got to be prepared for a few rough tackles (which are always okay, providing it’s made by an englishman…) »»Arsene Knows««

  • I hope City have a good season too – if only because they were willing to show that you don’t have to kick us or park the team bus to give us a game. Hleb is annoying when he cuts in side as he does – what can he hope to achieve? – apart from winning a penalty, setting up Cesc and 3 or 4 other key passes it came to nothing. Clearly what we need is a winger – someone who can – err – run down the wings.

  • Isn’t it similar to what Rosicky does though Amos? That’s what happens when you play (central) midfielders rather than wingers, and I agree we could do with a winger, even if it’s to give us more options. Having said that, you do have to ask yourself if that can work given the shocking way we dont attack anything in the air! Anyway, it’s odd to be playing relatively badly and winning.. I just wonder if this is us getting into gear to mount a serious challenge or if we are going to be stumbling a bit later on.

  • masterful headline… “Kasper proved to be a most unfriendly ghost from the Gunners” all very clever i dare to say you are a better lyricist than biggie smalls or jay z but i dont wanna start any east coast west coast beef…we seem alot more solid than last season and apart from the fulham game i havent been as stressed watching us as last season. i think its mainly due to having people out of their best positions. apart from gallas does anyone know when the injured are returning??? i.e. diaby,eboue, senderos and bakari?

  • LD mate, you better watch that sarcasm about Hleb (and it being annoying when he does that innit?) cos all the Heb haters will be well to illiterate to understand you were having a laugh.

  • mish, Le Boss reckons senderos and Bakari will both be o.k for Wednesday. I thought it was a good performance altho’ I wish i had stayed on the West side of the ground, that bloody sun in my eyes for 2 hours was excrutiating. Teams like City will be hard to break down this season as West Ham, Man Yoo and Derby have found to their cost so a win can’t be taken too lightly.

  • Good piece as always LD! Even better headline this time around! Yeah the spotlight’s on Cesc but I think a few other players deserve honorary mentions: (1) Gilberto was excellent in CB, in his first game back! (2) Flamini also filled in nicely for Sagna, whose injury btw is believed to be minor and short-term. Flamini may not be the most talented guy in our team but his steel and passion is so apparent and contagious. (3) Rosicky seemed much more dangerous now, again back from injury, and again played out of position on the left flank. (4) RvP didn’t have a good game but still had like 2 shots on target or something. Maybe he’s tired from the Netherlands game earlier. (5) Denilson looked lively as well, not afraid to put his boots into people to win the ball back, something that’d complement Cesc’s game quite well. (6) Almunia looked composed/calm and he’s a goalie who doesn’t take as much risk as Lehmann, which is a good thing for our defence to have at the moment. (7) Hleb needless to say, 2 goals in as many games at the start of the season, then won a penalty and provided an assist in the 4th game. I’m for one putting up my hand and eating 2 slices of humble pie on him and Flamini. Here’s a good piece about him: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/football/premier_league/article2332226.ece

  • I’ve always had a lot of time for Flamini, what he makes up for in talent he more than compensates for in application. A true 100% player and he takes no s***. The way he flew in when Clichy was booted up in the air in Amsterdam being a perfect example.

  • Yeah hatespur, I’m sure you also enjoyed how he earned a yellow card for challenging Robbie Savage – with his arse in his face!! LMAO!!!

  • Very amusing, although it originally looked like they clashed arses seeing as Sav’s face looks like a badly damaged arse.

Comments are closed.